I posted this on the AVVO website a little while go.
I was made aware of this situation appx 3 hours ago.
"Unprovoked physical injurious attack on tenant & another outside person by tenant's landlord on landlord's property.
Tenant Lyn had been living there 4 months. Incident occurred when she did not close her room door after leaving room. Landlord "Tim" verbally & physically attacked Lyn due to this, also attacked man "Bub" whom Lyn called to be picked up. Injuries include severe contusions on Lyn and Bub; severe contusions around Lyn's eye area indicates possible head injury. Severe lacerations (not requiring suture) present on Bub's neck and leg. Landlord smashed tenant's cell phone & said, "NOW you CAN'T call the police!" Police & 911 called to home of Bub, BUT Lyn did NOT want to go to hospital. Neither injured parties went despite urging. Police subsequently arrested Tim. Current charges not known.
Poss. exists incident was in LA Co. by Orange Co."
Poss. exists incident was in LA Co. by Orange Co."
I also emailed a lawyer acquaintance with these basics, below:
Do you know of a lawyer, contingency-based (and THIS case could easily run into some bucks, contingency-wise!) who does criminal law for:
Landlord liability re: tenant abuse:
Landlord physically and verbally abusing tenant, mental and harassment included:
Landlord physically and verbally abusing person who went to pick up tenant:
Landlord destruction of tenant property:
Tenant fearful of everything now!:
Tenant has NOWHERE to go.
and THAT'S just for starters!!!
We're (ok, I'M) doing a blow-by-blow (oh shit, sorry, bad joke) of who-what-where-when-why with notes, pictures and audio, but I REALLY FEEL there shouild be a lawyer in the mix.
The lady in question is handicapped, in shock right now, didn't want to go to the hospital because she couldn't afford it (I pointed out to the person who's doing the recording with my recorder that she SHOULD go to the hospital because since the attack happened when she was a tenant, the landlord's property insurance must pay!!)
It just happened this morning.
I don't have her phone number which is not helpful anyway because the property he destroyed was her cell phone.
There's another handicapped lady living there too & she's afraid to open her mouth. He verbally abuses her too.
The point I'm making here regarding my position at Goodwill is that I was always called upon to do some basic/preliminary legal research for something.
I usually really researched it and then gave a synopsis with references as to what I had found out, thereby letting the requesting party know the basics and they could decide to go from there without sounding like they didn't know anything.
I JUST NOW realized that my basic talent is to research and find out what people DON'T KNOW, so they can know a little bit about what they request and KNOW THE RIGHT QUESTIONS TO ASK.
Example:
Someone is taking a medication, has heard that a different but similar medication might work better, they ask me to find out about it.
I go into research mode by:
- Finding out what they're on now, for what, dosage, etc.:
- Why they're on it:
- How long they've been on it, and
- Does the medication researched do that also? What differences or similarities does this medication have with the other one? What are the contraindications (like, what side effects) are there for each medication?
So in effect, I gave the requestor the information they need to determine WHAT QUESTIONS THEY WANT OR NEED TO ASK their doctor?
Information is key: information allows you to be on top of what you NEED to be, without taking others' word for it.
I'm basically not a distrustful person per se, BUT I like to know whatinthehell someone's talking about so I can figure out why they're talking about it and the affects. But I've always like to learn things, because even if something I learn doesn't affect me or mine now, it could point me into a direction that I need to go for something else. And THAT'S why I feel my research skills are SO important for others!
YES, OF COURSE I always protect myself with caveats, like 'Information I'm providing is not necessarily provided by a professional, this information is just for general use and doesn't mean it applies specifically to you, blah blah blah".
Does this make sense???
Yesterday was 'Ask the computer whiz Lynne about Outlook and about SSDI lawyers'!
I received TWO phone calls for these topics, and you know what? ONE OF THEM I COULDN'T ANSWER!!!
I do NOT have a fear of saying 'I don't know', sometimes people are SO SURPRISED that I don't know an answer, but I think personally it's great because I can really find out and learn about something vs. doing pure research.
ANOTHER thing that helps my research is knowing the nomenclature (i.e. words) to use to maximize the correct results.
Example:
To research the tenant/landlord thing above, I decided that first I wanted some sort of a LIST to go by i.e. questions to ask, what is needed from the injured party re: their thoughts, feelings, why they don't want to go to the hospital (because you KNOW if it goes to court, THAT'LL be brought up! "Miss Simpson, if you and others felt you were injured and you were informally told that you possibly had a head injury, WHY THEN DIDN'T YOU GO TO THE HOSPITAL?".
I NEVER create anything or reinvent the wheel if I can find the 'wheel' online, so I Google'd 'physical attack': 'landlord attacks tenant': all sorts of stuff.
Didn't get a list at ALL, not even anything CLOSE to a list!!
But I DID get
Stuff he could be charged with:
Stuff she could do NOW:
Stuff that should be paid for: